Unanswered topics » Active topics


Board index » Miami Dolphins » Dolphin Talk

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ



Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 19 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Big Dave
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 14561
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
TEAM NEEDS

1. Nose tackle: Although Miami re-signed Jason Ferguson, his age, health and idle status for the first eight games due to a suspension screams for a young replacement, especially with only an inconsistent Paul Soliai as the current insurance policy. Tennessee DT Dan Williams could be a potential target, although Parcells prefers to collect DTs in the later rounds. If Terrence Cody drops because of weight issues, he could be had when Miami chooses at No. 43.

2. Wide receiver: Dolphins wideouts combined to catch just six touchdown passes, including three by rookie Brian Hartline and just one by underachieving Ted Ginn Jr. Davone Bess and Greg Camarillo are dependable possession receivers but the Dolphins are desperate for a No. 1 playmaking receiver who can stretch the field. They've shown an interest in Syracuse's Mike Williams, LSU's Brandon LaFell and later in the draft Louisville's Scott Long.

3. Free safety: Cutting free-agent bust Gibril Wilson, a major culprit in Miami allowing 23 touchdown passes and 40 pass completions that were 25 yards or more, needs to be addressed even with second-year safety Chris Clemons in the fold. The Dolphins swung and missed in free agency with safeties Antrel Rolle and Ryan Clark.


http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/team/miami ... port/67052

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
phinphan-n-buffalo
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 494
Location: Ruff Buff NY
Yeah we need all three of those things but were do we look to get them the draft or FA? or maybe both places

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Iowafin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Phins Rock
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 5:44 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
Iowafin wrote:
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB


But taking a Rb at 12 would be cool.......?
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Iowafin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Phins Rock wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB


But taking a Rb at 12 would be cool.......?


You have 9 picks. Why does the first one have to be at a need position if the best guy available isn't one of them?

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Phins Rock
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:21 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
Iowafin wrote:
Phins Rock wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB


But taking a Rb at 12 would be cool.......?


You have 9 picks. Why does the first one have to be at a need position if the best guy available isn't one of them?


You just implied that WR shouldn't be the pick at 12 because it is not a need, but you are also the biggest advocate of CJ Spiller on this board.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
phinsfansc
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Columbia, SC
Iowafin wrote:
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB


No need to argue with you Iowa, but needless to say I disagree with your assessment.

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Big Dave
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 14561
Location: Raleigh, NC
Big Dave wrote:
Dolphins wideouts combined to catch just six touchdown passes, including three by rookie Brian Hartline and just one by underachieving Ted Ginn Jr.


Sorry, but I just puked in my mouth with that. Thank God for Hartline.

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Iowafin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Phins Rock wrote:

You just implied that WR shouldn't be the pick at 12


I did? You can read into all you want, all i said was that receiver is not a need.

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
phinsfansc
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Columbia, SC
Big Dave wrote:
Big Dave wrote:
Dolphins wideouts combined to catch just six touchdown passes, including three by rookie Brian Hartline and just one by underachieving Ted Ginn Jr.


Sorry, but I just puked in my mouth with that. Thank God for Hartline.


Actually Dave, it was 5 in 2009 and 5 in 2008.

Bess(2), Hartline(3), Ginn(1) in 2009.
Ginn(2), Camarillo(2), Bess(1) in 2008.

But Miami does not need a WR, they will be just fine.

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
phinphan-n-buffalo
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 494
Location: Ruff Buff NY
:hithead: Y r some of u saying we dont neeeeeeeeeed a wr? if teams r not afraid of the pass they will key in on the run and ooppps there goes Ronnie or Rick or Cobb out agin. We all think that we do need some help on the D side of the ball but do we go D 1st and hope a late wr will pan out fast for us (i.e.) M. Colston of the Saints or we take a chance and pick DEZ if he is there with the 12pick. I know its the Tunas way to draft for long term and not short term but do we really want to wait on a (wr) do develop (i.e.) Pat Turner form last year.....dont get me wrong still have hope for him but Im tired of saying......well maybe next year we can get a guy like some other team already drafted just my opion..... :???

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
hypocritex
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Ring of Honor
Phinfever Ring of Honor

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 1191
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Maybe we get lucky and Hartline has a stellar second year. That would be awesome.

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
phinphan-n-buffalo
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 7:36 pm
Posts: 494
Location: Ruff Buff NY
hypocritex wrote:
Maybe we get lucky and Hartline has a stellar second year. That would be awesome.

Yeah him and P. Turner both........fingers crossed.....and toes lol

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Iowafin
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
phinsfansc wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
I've said it before, but maybe it's worth a second stab. Miami does not NEED a receiver. It'd be a luxury. They can score. They have good receivers. A number 1 would be nice but it's not needed. What's needed is a defensive pass rush and a new defensive scheme. They've partly addressed that with Nolan and Dansby.
Needs: NT, OLB


No need to argue with you Iowa, but needless to say I disagree with your assessment.


It's ok, I think most do.

_________________
Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Big Dave
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:05 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 14561
Location: Raleigh, NC
hypocritex wrote:
Maybe we get lucky and Hartline has a stellar second year. That would be awesome.


The only problem is that Hartline, Camarillo, and Bess are the same types of receivers. I like all 3 of them, but none of them stretch the field. Ginn can stretch the field, but I think he surprised Parcells by taking a step back last year. If the Dolphins continue to rest their hopes that these receivers will take the next step forward I think they are kidding themselves. They are what they are ... and I love the roles that Hartline, Camarillo, and Bess play for us.

I poked at Tony saying that he nagged me into liking Dez Bryant, but the fact is is that he used sound arguments to convince me that Bryant is worth the risk.

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
10acjed
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline
User avatar
2017 VIP Donor!
2017 VIP Donor!

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:43 pm
Posts: 5799
Location: Wellington, FL
What about a TE?? Fasano had 7 TD's in 2008, which made the WR not need as many, and with this style of ground n pound any time they are in the red zone the size guys come in...

So I say we need a TE as much as a WR... Fasano was disappointing in 09.....

_________________
Caution: Reply may contain sarcasm
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Big Dave
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 14561
Location: Raleigh, NC
10acjed wrote:
What about a TE??


Parcells likes a tough tight end with good hands. He may surprise everyone and draft one high.

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image
Top
   
Reply with quote  
10acjed
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 9:51 am 
Offline
User avatar
2017 VIP Donor!
2017 VIP Donor!

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:43 pm
Posts: 5799
Location: Wellington, FL
Honestly I would be happy with any of the "needs" being filled early, and I hope only the "needs" will be picked with the first 4...

NT - OLB/DE - FS - TE - WR, while I know a WR really isnt a "need" as much as others, if we are going to get one from the draft, the sooner the better as we must account for 2 seasons of development...

NT - Just need one, no way around it
FS - " See above "

OLB/DE - Porter gone, and even if Taylor comes back we need someone for the future, however JT coming back could push this pick to the later rounds, and use an early one next year for it.

TE - Let Haynos & Fasano compete for that position and get a solid # 1 TE

WR - Draft? Well we would have to give him 1 - 2 seasons to develop, so better do it this year...

Just some random thoughts... I am not thinking div title or post season for 2010, just good competition to get the team to continue to gel...

_________________
Caution: Reply may contain sarcasm
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Rusjen
PostPosted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Rookie
Phinfever Rookie

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:20 pm
Posts: 27
Location: Virginia
I think it would be hard to pass on Spiller even if he is not a "need".

I think WR is a true need. I'm not sold that any WR is going to come in from the draft, andy round and including Bryant, and make this team better at the WR position from day one. Normally, WR take time to develop.

Some potentially wonderful defensive players will be available at 12 - do we take the best of that group.

The draft will be fun. Hope we can find some "immediate impact" folks like last year.

_________________
As a kid I would wear swimming goggles under my Dolphins helmet in order to look like Bob Griese.
Top
   
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 19 posts ] 

Board index » Miami Dolphins » Dolphin Talk

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | Chopped and modified by Coots | Original design by Prosk8r