Phinfever.com

Catch the madness!

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ




Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:20 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:24 am
Posts: 4104
Bringing us back to the draft now amongst all the Free Agency hype... he's meeting with a bunch of teams but good to see he's at least on the radar.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miam ... 8668.story


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:24 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
I still think he goes 12.

Wallace, Cook, Austin.....I like!


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar
2016 DRAFT GURU
2016 DRAFT GURU

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 5507
Location: Columbia, SC
Phins Rock wrote:
I still think he goes 12.

Wallace, Cook, Austin.....I like!



darn Real............ :grin:

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:42 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 8:24 am
Posts: 4104
It would really be amazing... i dont think ive seen that dynamic of an offense on this team... ever.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 6:43 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:04 pm
Posts: 8232
Wallace, Austin, and Hartline...screw defense.


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 12, 2013 9:45 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 5:59 pm
Posts: 5117
I'd rather have Patterson than Austin. Patterson is a big receiver that can go up and get the ball in the redzone. We need a big physical guy like that.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:18 am 
Offline
2016 Draft Analyst
2016 Draft Analyst

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:52 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Lancaster, PA
wkloiber13 wrote:
I'd rather have Patterson than Austin. Patterson is a big receiver that can go up and get the ball in the redzone. We need a big physical guy like that.


whether it's Patterson or some other receiver, we really do need a large receiver. We're very small right now.


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:32 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:13 pm
Posts: 359
Yeah even with the signing of Wallace I'd still be down to take a WR at 12. I also think the draft is deep enough at WR to get another quality guy in the second or third (possibly get the next TY Hilton).

The draft is also deep at DE, so I think best available between those two positions is the best possible option with the confidence that there will be good choices later.

_________________
305sportsblog.blogspot.com

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:36 am 
Offline
2016 Draft Analyst
2016 Draft Analyst

Joined: Sat Nov 27, 2010 12:52 am
Posts: 11242
Location: Lancaster, PA
TheBigFish wrote:
Yeah even with the signing of Wallace I'd still be down to take a WR at 12. I also think the draft is deep enough at WR to get another quality guy in the second or third (possibly get the next TY Hilton).

The draft is also deep at DE, so I think best available between those two positions is the best possible option with the confidence that there will be good choices later.


Now that we have Wallace in fold I want either Bjoern Werner or Xavier Rhodes with our first pick. We can get a guy like Deandre Hopkins or Justin Hunter early in the 2nd round to complete our receiver core.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | Chopped and modified by Coots | Original design by Prosk8r