You need to change your arguement.
Why, because you can't defeat it?
Because you haven't give me one shred of evidence that shows where this site has the right information to properly evaluate the Miami Dolphins, or any team for that matter.
This thread is about Elvis Dumervil, why are you talking about the Miami Dolphins?
The discussion we are having is about Elvis Dumervil and his ability to stop the run. I know it isn't beneficial for you to have that discussion, because he is clearly a terrible run defender, and you can try to change it all you want, but that's the discussion.
Again, you have been dismissing this site since I started referencing Dumervil's ranking against the run compared to other 4-3 defensive ends.
But you don't have a better source. All you can say is he got 50 tackles. But you cannot pull anything that tells us how many run STOPS he got. You can't cite anything that referencing how he performed on a play by play basis. Because only one cite gives us this information.
All you've tried to do is dismiss the site and their method of analysis. You were completely unaware that NFL teams, major media sources, NFL agents and players use this site as a reference tool. You even said yourself that you had never seen PFF used as a source except on these forums, as if that alone is a reason to dismiss what they bring to the table.
Now that you've been faced with overwhelming evidence that others value what PFF brings that are heavily in the know about football, from NFL teams to agents to reporters like Adam Schefter, all you can do is look for the escape clause in your losing argument. But there is none.
Dumervil is a liability against the run in a 4-3 defense. He's going to the right place in Baltimore to use his skillset as a 3-4 defender. He would not have been a good fit in Miami as an every down player, only as a situational pass rusher.
Like I said, be a big boy and admit you had it wrong and move on.
Or continue being hard-headed and making yourself look less and less credible with each post.