Phinfever.com

Catch the madness!

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ




Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
2016 MODERATOR
2016 MODERATOR

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7530
Location: Massachusetts
:yay: :grin:

http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/ ... ass-rusher

You add a nice young pass rusher to opposite this guy....Well...


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
2016 DRAFT GURU
2016 DRAFT GURU

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 5501
Location: Columbia, SC
It will be interesting to see how Mike Nolan uses Cameron, but he really needs to step his game up in regards to run defense.

Miami needs him on the field for 3 downs, not only on 3rd down.

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:15 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Rookie
Phinfever Rookie

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:02 am
Posts: 51
Location: Chillicothe Oh.
cant wait to see his stats this year when he will be a starter. wake is a beast wont supprise me if he's not one of the leading sackers :yay:


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:40 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 11999
Location: Raleigh, NC
One of the intangibles about Porter was his leadership at Pittsburgh. Well, I think he showed everyone what his leadership was all about when he insulted his former teammates in order to justify himself when he wanted to be released. It's all about Porter.


Tim Graham wrote:
ProFootballFocus.com credited Wake with 20 pressures, six hits and seven sacks (5.5 actual sacks) on only 134 rushes.

Porter tallied 11 pressures, five hits and nine sacks (nine actual) on 354 rushes.

Porter had a 5.93 PRP, fifth on the team behind Wake, Taylor, Kendall Langford (6.42) and Randy Starks (6.34).

"As it turns out Wake was actually generating more pressure, period, than Porter, let alone on a per-snap basis," Monson said. "Given all those numbers, someone might want to suggest to Porter he watch the tape and think himself lucky he wasn't losing more snaps to Wake."

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 4:52 pm 
Offline
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am
Posts: 4152
Location: The Bluegrass
Big Dave wrote:
One of the intangibles about Porter was his leadership at Pittsburgh. Well, I think he showed everyone what his leadership was all about when he insulted his former teammates in order to justify himself when he wanted to be released. It's all about Porter.


Tim Graham wrote:
ProFootballFocus.com credited Wake with 20 pressures, six hits and seven sacks (5.5 actual sacks) on only 134 rushes.

Porter tallied 11 pressures, five hits and nine sacks (nine actual) on 354 rushes.

Porter had a 5.93 PRP, fifth on the team behind Wake, Taylor, Kendall Langford (6.42) and Randy Starks (6.34).

"As it turns out Wake was actually generating more pressure, period, than Porter, let alone on a per-snap basis," Monson said. "Given all those numbers, someone might want to suggest to Porter he watch the tape and think himself lucky he wasn't losing more snaps to Wake."


That a simpleton explanation. It's all about winning. We didn't do very much of that 2 of his 3 years here.

_________________
A good RB is nice, a good QB even better, but it's best to be able to stop someone first.


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 7:25 am 
Offline
User avatar
2016 MVP Donor!
2016 MVP Donor!

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 6:43 pm
Posts: 5343
Location: Wellington, FL
I said it all last season... He was over paid for his production and Anderson/Wake looked like an upgrade at times...

one productive season is not enough, and if you have a look now you will see nobody is concerned about him slipping away to another team..

He is no Peppers...

_________________
Caution: Reply may contain sarcasm


Top
   
PostPosted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Starter
Phinfever Starter

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:57 am
Posts: 226
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
I like Wake, he's a good story :) I hope he improves and gets more downs next season. Would be awesome if he got doubledigit sacks :)

_________________
-
A Dane lost on the internet, crashed here
-


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 5:37 am 
Offline
User avatar
2016 Post Game Blog Writer
2016 Post Game Blog Writer

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 24756
Location: Miami, FL
Wake's "effeciency" will go down as he plays more. Unless he has Superman-like stamina.

_________________
Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Tue Mar 16, 2010 6:06 am 
Offline
User avatar
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 11999
Location: Raleigh, NC
I thought Pasqualoni did a good job of utilizing Cam-Wake. He's been one-dimensional, so, he is not a complete OLB. They tried him in coverage at practice and was getting roasted.

One thing about him is that when he is in the game the other team knows that he's going after the quarterback, and he still applied pressure. It will be interesting to see whether Nolan can get Wake up to the next level. Personally I think he is what he is and that is a pass rusher.

_________________
PHINFEVER FACEBOOK - JOIN US!

Image


Top
   
PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:31 am 
Offline
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am
Posts: 4152
Location: The Bluegrass
Rich wrote:
Wake's "effeciency" will go down as he plays more. Unless he has Superman-like stamina.


Agreed. It's like saying that RB "X" has a 10 YPC average with just 1 carry.

_________________
A good RB is nice, a good QB even better, but it's best to be able to stop someone first.


Top
   
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC-05:00


Phinfever Home Page

Phinfever Chatroom

Phinfever FAQ


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited | Chopped and modified by Coots | Original design by Prosk8r