View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 10:15 pm



Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ] 
 Report: Smiley on trade block 
Author Message
Phinfever Hall of Famer
Phinfever Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:09 am
Posts: 774
Location: Fort Lauderdale
 Report: Smiley on trade block
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/22/report-smiley-is-on-the-trade-block/

Quote:
Report: Smiley is on the trade block
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on March 22, 2010 10:03 AM ET
The addition of Richie Incognito in Miami means a subtraction is coming on the Dolphins offensive line.

Edgar Thompson of the Palm Beach Post reports guard Justin Smiley has been told to stay away from the team's offseason conditioning program because the team plans to trade him.


I like Smiley, the guy is physical and has a great team attitude, but has struggled to stay healthy. This move could save us some nice money, lets just hope Incognito can keep his head on his shoulders.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:49 am
Profile
Phinfever Starter
Phinfever Starter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:57 am
Posts: 226
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Besides the injuries a very good player. What are they looking to get out of this, you think?

_________________
-
A Dane lost on the internet, crashed here
-


Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:51 am
Profile
Phinfever Draft Insider
Phinfever Draft Insider
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 11:14 pm
Posts: 3376
Location: Columbia, SC
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
A starting OG still in his 20's, but with an injury history. 3-4 round pick. I just guessing my butt off though.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:05 am
Profile
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer
Phinfever Live!, Blog Writer
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:59 am
Posts: 20605
Location: Miami, FL
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
I don't like it.

Smiley is a good player and you can never be TOO deep at offensive line.

With Long, Carey, Grove, Smiley, Thomas, Berger, Garner and Incognito we have line that goes 8 deep.

That's exactly what is needed.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:19 am
Profile
Phinfever Starter
Phinfever Starter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 3:57 am
Posts: 226
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Rich wrote:
I don't like it.

Smiley is a good player and you can never be TOO deep at offensive line.

With Long, Carey, Grove, Smiley, Thomas, Berger, Garner and Incognito we have line that goes 8 deep.

That's exactly what is needed.


Maybe they are expecting to draft a rookie or two as well.

_________________
-
A Dane lost on the internet, crashed here
-


Mon Mar 22, 2010 9:27 am
Profile
2014 Phinfever VIP!
2014 Phinfever VIP!

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 11:34 am
Posts: 875
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Rich wrote:
I don't like it.

Smiley is a good player and you can never be TOO deep at offensive line.

With Long, Carey, Grove, Smiley, Thomas, Berger, Garner and Incognito we have line that goes 8 deep.

That's exactly what is needed.


Exactly right.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 11:49 am
Profile
Phinfever Owner/Admin
Phinfever Owner/Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 9:41 am
Posts: 8402
Location: Raleigh, NC
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
So much for developing chemistry on the left side of the line. It will be interesting to hear their explanation of it .... if we are even "worthy" of it.

_________________
Phinfever Facebook

Image


Download the Free Phinfever Browser Toolbar

Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 12:10 pm
Profile WWW
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
I'm a little disapointed as Justin is one of my favorite players, and is the clear leader of that offensive line.

However, I'm not surprised, and it would not be a bad move. If you can get a 3rd round pick, especially if it is one early in the round, I think that would be a very beneficial trade for Miami. Right now you have 4 starting caliber guards.

One is a little inconsistent, but considering his background, there is no reason to believe Route 66 won't be seeing many Pro Bowls. DT is also very cheap.
One is highly talented, and if he can be controlled, is also a Pro Bowl caliber player who fits our blocking scheme perfectly. On a one year deal, but fairly cheap.
The other is also developing, but very nicely into a new position at guard. He's also very cheap.

And then you have the veteran, expensive, injury prone OG. It's not like you HAVE to trade one of them, but it wouldn't be a bad deal to move one of them and acquire some more draft picks in a loaded draft.

Miami could also be planning to use a pick on Jerry, the OG out of Ole Miss, (Peria Jerry's brother), as they loved him at the Senior Bowl.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:44 pm
Profile
Phinfever Blog Writer - Thursdays
Phinfever Blog Writer - Thursdays

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 10:47 am
Posts: 5406
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Everyone was big on Thomas but early in the season when I singled out Smiley in tapes, he was flat out awesome. 15 yards downfield pancaking folks on running plays. I don't get this at all. Let him heal and bring him back.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:54 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 1:49 am
Posts: 4144
Location: The Bluegrass
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
NFLJunkie wrote:
Everyone was big on Thomas but early in the season when I singled out Smiley in tapes, he was flat out awesome. 15 yards downfield pancaking folks on running plays. I don't get this at all. Let him heal and bring him back.


He's been healing for 4 seasons. He hasn't completed a season in 4 years because of injury. He's missed a cumulative 1/2 season just while here in Miami. I agree that OLine depth is needed, but nothing interrupts the cohesion of a unit like a guy who can't stay on the field season after season.

You don't pay guys with the expectations that they will only play for 2/3 of the season. Smiley hasn't shown anywhere he's been that he can play for more than that.

This was the foreseeable problem when they brought him in. We gambled and lost. If we can get a pick for hi, I'm all for it.

_________________
A good RB is nice, a good QB even better, but it's best to be able to stop someone first.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:33 pm
Profile WWW
Phinfever Hall of Famer
Phinfever Hall of Famer
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 3:42 pm
Posts: 955
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Could be a smoke screen.. could be bs.

Maybe they are just seeing what they could get for him. My guess ittle be during the draft he is traded if at all. Maybe Smiley and our 2nd for Brandon Marshall? I don't know.. just speculating.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 2:46 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
So they went after a free agent that they knew had injury problems, he comes in and plays great until he gets injured, and now they want to trade him? Injuries are part of the game, and rotating offensive linemen and defensive linemen has become about as necessary part of the game as having a two-headed backfield.
I don't know, getting rid of a guy because he's hurting the team while in the game is one thing (Ted Ginn, Gibril Wilson, Akin Ayodele, etc), but to get rid of a guy because he's missed 5 games in two years doesn't seem right.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:03 pm
Profile
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Iowafin wrote:
So they went after a free agent that they knew had injury problems, he comes in and plays great until he gets injured, and now they want to trade him? Injuries are part of the game, and rotating offensive linemen and defensive linemen has become about as necessary part of the game as having a two-headed backfield.
I don't know, getting rid of a guy because he's hurting the team while in the game is one thing (Ted Ginn, Gibril Wilson, Akin Ayodele, etc), but to get rid of a guy because he's missed 5 games in two years doesn't seem right.


He's missed 9 games in two years, and another 4 he only got limited action.

At the time, we did not have Thomas, Garner, and now Incognito;

He has missed significant playing time for us in each of his 2 years here, and is replaceable. I love the guy too, but he isn't Ronnie or Jake Long to this offense. He's a guy that we can probably replace with Incognito, and probably Garner and not lose a beat.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:48 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Phins Rock wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
So they went after a free agent that they knew had injury problems, he comes in and plays great until he gets injured, and now they want to trade him? Injuries are part of the game, and rotating offensive linemen and defensive linemen has become about as necessary part of the game as having a two-headed backfield.
I don't know, getting rid of a guy because he's hurting the team while in the game is one thing (Ted Ginn, Gibril Wilson, Akin Ayodele, etc), but to get rid of a guy because he's missed 5 games in two years doesn't seem right.


He's missed 9 games in two years, and another 4 he only got limited action.


http://www.nfl.com/players/justinsmiley ... =SMI010440

Not according to that.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 3:53 pm
Profile
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Sorry. Missed 9 games including the limited playing time. My bad. (It's actually 10 if you include the NE game, but he was not in for the entire game in that one either).

But still. Point is he has missed significant playing time to injuries that he has had before, or at least similar ones. He's still got value because of his age, character, and talent, but is a guy that we have replacements for in place already.

For anything less than a late 3rd, I would say no. But if they can get one, I'd be OK with it.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:02 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Phins Rock wrote:
and talent, but is a guy that we have replacements for in place already.

For anything less than a late 3rd, I would say no. But if they can get one, I'd be OK with it.


Yeah, I think a 3rd would be great, but do they really have replacements already in place? I don't trust Incognito, and Berger is more of a serviceable backup.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:07 pm
Profile
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Iowafin wrote:
Phins Rock wrote:
and talent, but is a guy that we have replacements for in place already.

For anything less than a late 3rd, I would say no. But if they can get one, I'd be OK with it.


Yeah, I think a 3rd would be great, but do they really have replacements already in place? I don't trust Incognito, and Berger is more of a serviceable backup.


I was referring to Incognito and Garner.


Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:15 pm
Profile
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 8941
Location: Fargo, ND
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Maybe we draft Oline in the 2nd and (assuming) the third we get for Smiley we draft a NT?


Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:18 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Phins Rock wrote:
Iowafin wrote:
Phins Rock wrote:
and talent, but is a guy that we have replacements for in place already.

For anything less than a late 3rd, I would say no. But if they can get one, I'd be OK with it.


Yeah, I think a 3rd would be great, but do they really have replacements already in place? I don't trust Incognito, and Berger is more of a serviceable backup.


I was referring to Incognito and Garner.


So Garner at LG and Incognito at RG? Idk...I'd rather have Richie as a backup/sub. A rotation of him and Thomas? Idk, none seem as serviceable as what Smiley can and has been. Minus 4 games every year.

_________________
Image


Mon Mar 22, 2010 4:22 pm
Profile
Phinfever Global Moderator
Phinfever Global Moderator

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 7532
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Iowafin wrote:
So Garner at LG and Incognito at RG? Idk...I'd rather have Richie as a backup/sub. A rotation of him and Thomas? Idk, none seem as serviceable as what Smiley can and has been. Minus 4 games every year.


Lol. No. I mean they would be fighting for LG. I'm assuming Thomas is the starting RG.

BTW, I am not a fan of rotating the offensive line. I think Miami is the only team in the NFL to do so. I really am a firm believer in unity, and cohesiveness along the line. If you have 5 guys who are healthy and effective, I don't think you should be rotating them in and out. Leave them in there and let them go to work. While they would deny it, I guarantee you that the starting 5 is not as comfortable when there is rotation going on as opposed to letting the starting 5 play.

Granted, last year there were weeks where we were forced to rotate, as guys like Smiley and Grove were not completely healthy. However, if our starting 5 is healthy, I think Miami should go back to doing what they were doing before the Carolina week. Sit back, and enjoy the best running game in the NFL with the best 5 mauling offensive lineman in the NFL, (unit wise).


Mon Mar 22, 2010 5:29 pm
Profile
2014 Phinfever VIP!
2014 Phinfever VIP!

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 10:17 am
Posts: 3262
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Quote:
Other reports say the Dolphins are asking for a third-round pick for Justin Smiley. Huh? They don't want Smiley because of injuries. Yet they're supposedly asking other teams for a third-round pick for him? No chance of getting that. As I said when Smiley was told he was gone, they'll be lucky to get anything for him at all.


http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports/ ... l+blogs%29


Tue Mar 23, 2010 1:00 pm
Profile
Phinfever All Pro
Phinfever All Pro
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 5:48 am
Posts: 442
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
dont know if its of any note ,but the hawks traded there guard rob sims yesterday too the lions for
a 5th rnd pick , dont know if it adds fuel to the smiley too the hawks trade rumors ??????

i doubt it


Tue Apr 06, 2010 9:45 am
Profile
Phinfever Starter
Phinfever Starter

Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:20 pm
Posts: 156
Location: Mexico City
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Smiley is not worth a 3rd round... at most he's worth a 4th...

If we get a 3rd we should be happy... but I really doubt someone will give us that. I wouldn't... lol

_________________
Image


Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:07 am
Profile
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor
2013 Phinfever VIP Donor

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 8941
Location: Fargo, ND
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Wasn't Smiley the one that visited the Hawks several years ago and then resigned with the Chargers for a boat load of money? I remember the Hawks offering him (or maybe it wasn't him) a boatload of money and he used it as a leveraging tool to get a better contract out of the Chargers so that he could stay there and get mo money.


Tue Apr 06, 2010 2:41 pm
Profile
Phinfever Legend
Phinfever Legend
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 2:55 pm
Posts: 5439
Post Re: Report: Smiley on trade block
Phin wrote:
Wasn't Smiley the one that visited the Hawks several years ago and then resigned with the Chargers for a boat load of money? I remember the Hawks offering him (or maybe it wasn't him) a boatload of money and he used it as a leveraging tool to get a better contract out of the Chargers so that he could stay there and get mo money.


Smiley played with the 49ers. The end.

_________________
Image


Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:15 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 25 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007, 2010 phpBB Group.
Designed by Coots & IamPZ - Phinfever.com.